Friday, November 30, 2012
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Second Screen - part II
While we are talking about Second Screen:
Google Glasses are the Second Screen to Life.
Really, I mean it. With all the consequences. Think about it.
I'm not even saying this is good.
Google Glasses are the Second Screen to Life.
Really, I mean it. With all the consequences. Think about it.
I'm not even saying this is good.
Labels:
google,
technology
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Thoughts on Second Screen
With the ongoing success of tablets, media companies and many social platforms get all exited about the "Second Screen".
Second Screen is short hand for getting additional content on your tablet while watching TV. Sometimes it refers to the device itself, sometimes to certain apps on this device.
The quest for the perfect second screen app reminds me of the race for killer app in the early 2000s for the mobile phones. Everyone is jumping in and wants to define the second screen experience.
TV stations, networks and content owners/producers rush to the race in creating very narrow and limited second screen apps for certain programs, TV series', ... Just because they noticed the success of Twitter (and probably Facebook as well).
My 0.02$:
Yes, there is a (very positive) second screen trend right now... but it is defined by the users, not be the content providers. I don't see a lot of sense in creating separate apps per TV program, because that's not like we users behave.
When I watch TV (or a DVD, or streaming, for that matter) I do have my iPad on my lap (or next to me), and I spend quite some time with it: e.g. in IMDB, or Twitter, or Facebook, or Google+ (or my email).
Point is, it is somewhat, but not 100% related to the program I'm watching. I'd never open one specific app e.g. the Breaking Bad app just because I'm watching Breaking Bad...
I don't want to engage in anything (and most probably not the things, the network wants me to), I want to look up actors; or find some background information; or see where Downton Abbey exteriors where shot (link) and find that on Google maps; or have the twitter stream for the election night run by while I watch as Ohio is being called.
But that's my personal second screen usage or experience, not a pre-defined one.
Second Screen is short hand for getting additional content on your tablet while watching TV. Sometimes it refers to the device itself, sometimes to certain apps on this device.
The quest for the perfect second screen app reminds me of the race for killer app in the early 2000s for the mobile phones. Everyone is jumping in and wants to define the second screen experience.
TV stations, networks and content owners/producers rush to the race in creating very narrow and limited second screen apps for certain programs, TV series', ... Just because they noticed the success of Twitter (and probably Facebook as well).
My 0.02$:
Yes, there is a (very positive) second screen trend right now... but it is defined by the users, not be the content providers. I don't see a lot of sense in creating separate apps per TV program, because that's not like we users behave.
When I watch TV (or a DVD, or streaming, for that matter) I do have my iPad on my lap (or next to me), and I spend quite some time with it: e.g. in IMDB, or Twitter, or Facebook, or Google+ (or my email).
Point is, it is somewhat, but not 100% related to the program I'm watching. I'd never open one specific app e.g. the Breaking Bad app just because I'm watching Breaking Bad...
I don't want to engage in anything (and most probably not the things, the network wants me to), I want to look up actors; or find some background information; or see where Downton Abbey exteriors where shot (link) and find that on Google maps; or have the twitter stream for the election night run by while I watch as Ohio is being called.
But that's my personal second screen usage or experience, not a pre-defined one.
Labels:
media
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Social Bookmarking
Social bookmarking has changed a lot over the last couple of years.
What started with simple (and some say ugly) pure heading/URL lists, turned into magazine style full-color, hi-res, rich-media, insert-your-buzzword-here pages.
Observe - as an example - the change from he good old del.icio.us to Pocket or Flipboard.
I don't really won't to compare them with or against each other, because to me they define different categories or sub-categories of social bookmarking.
Here is how I use the various tools and platforms:
What started with simple (and some say ugly) pure heading/URL lists, turned into magazine style full-color, hi-res, rich-media, insert-your-buzzword-here pages.
Observe - as an example - the change from he good old del.icio.us to Pocket or Flipboard.
I don't really won't to compare them with or against each other, because to me they define different categories or sub-categories of social bookmarking.
Here is how I use the various tools and platforms:
- To publish or almost broadcast links, I use Facebook, Google+ or Twitter.
- To publish for a certain interest group - kind of newsletter like - I still use delicious and have people subscribe to the tag via RSS.
- To store for later reading, I use Pocket - especially because of the text-only view in Pocket, which make medium-size to long articles and posts really good to read on an iPad or phone.
- To save or archive URLs, I use delicious, sort of my bookmark vault.
Thursday, November 08, 2012
ifttt to the rescue
Since my feed from flickr to Facebook has been broken for a while now (and I re-authorized flickr on facebook and v.v.) I decided to work around this with ifttt.
No, I'm not out of my breath, I'm just using if this then that
A simple but very convenient service, with rules of the nature
So I created a rule
which takes every new picture I upload to flickr (with the tag #FB) and posts the URL to facebook
Bingo, it works again, and I can now control what is being posted to Facebook by adding or omitting the #FB tag.
Cool
You can slightly modify those rules, but you are bound to what ifttt offers. Pretty much actually.
Sort of competes with Yahoo Pipes in a way (if they were really still alive). Bit more powerful in some aspect, less powerful in others.
No, I'm not out of my breath, I'm just using if this then that
A simple but very convenient service, with rules of the nature
If (this) happens then trigger (that)with predefined "channels" for this and that. E.g. flickr and Facebook.
So I created a rule
which takes every new picture I upload to flickr (with the tag #FB) and posts the URL to facebook
Bingo, it works again, and I can now control what is being posted to Facebook by adding or omitting the #FB tag.
Cool
You can slightly modify those rules, but you are bound to what ifttt offers. Pretty much actually.
Sort of competes with Yahoo Pipes in a way (if they were really still alive). Bit more powerful in some aspect, less powerful in others.
Monday, November 05, 2012
[revisited] Google's reference gadgets
Almost 2 years ago (Jan 2011) I was musing about Google's reference device strategy; see my post from then.
At that time Google had the Nexus One (by HTC) and the Nexus S (by Samsung) devices out, they also released the Cr48 as a reference for their Chrome line.
And I was wondering
Well, they did, didn't they.
Here's the full Nexus family of devices as of now;
So, they did it.
Thanks
At that time Google had the Nexus One (by HTC) and the Nexus S (by Samsung) devices out, they also released the Cr48 as a reference for their Chrome line.
And I was wondering
I wonder when they will release such a reference device for tablets (with Android).
Or will they ever?
Well, they did, didn't they.
Here's the full Nexus family of devices as of now;
- a really cool smart-phone (Nexus 4)
- a mid size tablet (Nexus 7), that I really long for
and - a full tablet (Next 10)
So, they did it.
Thanks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)