Currently it suffers from being almost 100% self-referential... everyone on G+ only talks about G+.
Apart from that it reminds me a lot of friendfeed. (Odd, since FF was bought by Facebook - of all).
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDgGPa3MuLFgWXAqThoSBEXPCVJTlfgDdBgqLWHvXvt3Ut33iC_gA93rL8x4fVirNTHKgz8KayVXM4TL8FzeRfF0mzB_l5hu1E2CUdIztgx7UU-lTO7rTfZSUlbTpquFRpQRSE/s200/nohashgooglep.png)
G+'s most important task is to get additional signals to improve Google search/index, so hash-tags should serve well there. Wouldn't they?
Or does Google consider hash-tags as "messing with the algorithm" because they are being entered by humans... and not derived from their algorithms?
No comments:
Post a Comment